We got our second big project while learning about documentaries! We first watched a few documentaries to take notes on the techniques utilized and also view different stylizations. I would like to say I like how different documentaries can be, before this lesson if you had asked me "What do you think documentaries consist of" I probably would've answered something about generic natural geographic style and applied it to everything. I do know now that documentaries are very fluid and unique.
The very first documentary we watched was an episode from an episodic documentary called Abstract: The Art of Design (2019). The episode we watched in class was about costume design. The episode documented costume designer Ruth Carter. Her background, her career, and what she represents was also documented in this piece. The technique I learned from this documentary was very interesting. For example, because it is an episodic documentary, every episode starts off with an intro and theme song. Though, the intro is different per episode including scenes from popular movies and shows with a focus on the costumes. This piece utilized plenty of B-roll in most scenes, which kept it interesting and focused in a charming way. It was overall a nice documentary (episode), but It really didnt have as much of an impact on me as the other two did

The next documentary we saw I had the misfortune of not being able to watch fully (I missed the end :cry:). This one was called American Promise (2013). It is a documentary that spans 13 whole years, documenting the producer's son Idris & his best friend Seun living in New York. The boys are attending the Dalton School, a prestigious school. The overall motive of the documentary was to document the pressure placed on students and there was also the documenting of racism and how it was like to grow up in New York in such a presigious school as a black student. The most notable thing from this documentary's technique is how raw and alive it felt. The majority of the documentary was filmed by hand by the parents of Idris and Seun. A lot of the content was completely raw, with real emotion behind it, even the interviews were done rather suddenly, resulting in most of what was being said being 100% honest.
The very last documentary we watched before switching over to Op-docs was Exit Through the Gift Shop (2010). This was also my least favorite, but thats kind of because im biased and dont like Bansky. Anyways, the documentary follows a guy named Thierry Guetta, and Bansky. The documentary began showing how Guetta always loved video taping things, so after a few events he started taping street artists creating their work, shifting focus over to bansky for a bit. The documentary also puts an emphasis on the relationships Guetta made. However, the documentary shifts focus back to Guetta after he attempts to become a street artist without any proper meaning, resulting in controversy and displaying how people make meanings for the stuff they see. The style of the documentary is nice, it features lots of raw camera movements and jump-cuts, the B-roll did make the documentary more interesting, but it just wasnt my thing. I will, however, say that the documentary was a stylized version of rawness (you could equate this to boiled chicken :brokenheart:.

The next thing I watched was an Op-doc called View From the Floor (2025). The Op-doc talks about Mindie Lind, a disabled person with no legs. The overall topic is very interesting, talking about how people utilize disabled people as a source of "inspiration porn", or content one watches to make themselves feel good / better. I liked some of the decisions made, such as making interviews have an animated character to accompany the voice, but to be honest the downsides far outweigh the upsides in this piece. I would've loved this documentary as maybe a podcast or something, but the animation utilized for the entirety of the Op-doc is so damn ugly I straight up just cant be nice about it. I feel like its too oversaturated and it looks too similar to those "ugly adult show" artstyles. On the other hand, I feel like everything being animated didnt really allow for much technique. I view this documentary visually as a "what not to do" piece.